Comments on: Jonathan Ross gives us more proof that Natal is pointless

By: zykkon

zykkon — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:39:01 +0000

It's just Novelty toys created to make mass amounts of (what Sony/ Microsoft hope to be) CA$H plain and simple. but the Xbox/ PS crowd are most likely not the casual type that Nintendo has, hence it being pointless. The games look very simple and uninspired and I cant really see anyone playing final fantasy or gears or war on it. And everyone can see Sony’s is just a complete rip-off of Nintendo.

Where this will make money and I assume Microsoft have figured this out is that not everyone will wont want some little kid taking when we come home. Which makes me think their will be multiple skins to choose from e.g. sexy slut, sexy nerd, dominatrix and so fort that’s were the money is really. So yes natal is the future of semi interactive porn.

By: twhr

twhr — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:18:28 +0000

kev nailed it square in the ass, the Sony Arc dosen't look like it's up to much either but then again they aren't marketing it like something to be something that's going to solve the oil crisis while bouncing around a living room.

By: Kevin Dowling

Kevin Dowling — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:16:40 +0000

Really? I think Natal looks weak too. But I also think the Sony motion controller is also a weak tacked-on idea like the Eyetoy. Neither will serve the industry well. Hell, the Wii barely has any third party support – I don't know why MS/Sony think it's the way to go.

I don't think negative comments on Natal is something to perceive as “fanboyish” to be honest. It's not a slur on Microsoft, nor is it pimping Sony as being a great new saviour.

By: japanhumour

japanhumour — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:07:16 +0000

You guys are all fanboys, it's quite sickening

By: TWHR

TWHR — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:44:32 +0000

It looks so damn boring, hope they have something interesting at E3. For their sake!

By: Gunn

Gunn — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:55:32 +0000

Hmm lag central, reminds me of early eye toy games.

nice room though